What are some trade-offs associated with using static routes?

Using static routes involves a significant trade-off in that they require manual updates for each subnet added to the network. This means that any time a new subnet is introduced or when network topology changes occur, network administrators must manually configure these routes in each device that routes traffic for the affected networks. This process can be time-consuming and prone to human error, especially in larger networks with frequent changes.

In contrast, dynamic routing protocols automatically adjust to changes in network topology and can quickly adapt to new subnets or link failures without the need for manual intervention. This is a key advantage of using dynamic routing over static routing, making static routing less flexible in dynamic environments. Other options like automatic detection of link failures and integration with dynamic protocols further highlight the limitations of static routing compared to more advanced routing techniques.